Reality Straight Up!

Thoughts & Observations of a Free Range Astrophysicist

Saving Capitalism from Itself

VI. Economic Fairy Tales

For 60 years, policy-makers have looked to the Kuznets Curve for evidence that a rising tide lifts all boats. It is a lovely thought, if only it were true. (Part 6 in a series on Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the Twenty-First Century.”)

In 1955, Simon Kuznets published a paper that was destined to change the course of history. The paper, Economic Growth and Income Inequality, reported the discovery of a historical relationship between average income and inequality in the US and the UK.

In a plot of economic inequality versus per capita GNP, Kuznets reported that capitalist economies evolved along an inverted U-shaped curve. For a time when an economy is poor and agriculturally based, increasing average income results in greater inequality. But, said Kuznets, as technology causes incomes to rise, that inequality falls.

Wanting something does not make it true

To many, the implications were clear. If you just let it go, capitalism will eventually reduce the inequality between the wealthy and everyone else. Any time you hear someone talk about “trickle-down economics,” or say “a rising tide lifts all boats,” or talk about the wealthy as “job creators,” you are hearing the echo of Kuznets’s work. The Kuznets Curve continues to be a cornerstone of fiscal policy throughout much of the developed world, and in the US in particular.

All of that sounds great, especially if you are among those who are sitting on large piles of wealth. There is only one one minor problem. There never was much evidence to support the claim. Kuznets himself said that the paper was perhaps 5% real data and 95% pure speculation, and abandoned the curve later in life. But sometimes vast conclusions are drawn from half-vast data. And some ideas, once they are out there, develop a life of their own. That is especially true of ideas that we desperately want to be true.

The early 20th Century is not the best period for understanding how capitalism evolves

One of Piketty’s major contributions is a fresh and extremely rigorous reassessment of Kuznets’s claims. Much of Capital in the Twenty-First Century is spent analyzing a huge volume of economic, political and cultural data. Piketty’s sources of data are numerous, and cover periods from the early 19th Century up to the present day.

For his part, Kuznets relied exclusively on data from the first part of the 20th Century. That is not a criticism per se. Those were the only data that he had to work with. But the period that he studied included two world wars and the Great Depression. In the US it included dramatic changes in policy specifically aimed at reducing wealth inequality. Those included anti-trust legislation, the New Deal, new labor laws, and more progressive taxation, to name a few. In the UK there was a similar spate of policy reforms during the same period.

One could argue that the historical period that Kuznets looked at might not be especially representative of how things usually work. It can hardly be surprising that when Piketty looked over much longer historical periods using much more complete data, he could not replicate Kuznets’s findings. Piketty found instead that Kuznets’s results are dominated by the effects of those profound shocks to the world economy.

Kuznets’s work is interesting from a historical perspective, but it is largely meaningless when trying to understand the way that capitalism naturally evolves. It’s hard to say much about normal prevailing winds when the only data that you have were taken during a hurricane.

As things have settled down and the natural evolution of capitalist economies has reasserted itself, Piketty finds that rather than lifting all boats, economic growth has disproportionately benefited the wealthy. Quoting Piketty directly, the Kuznets Curve reflects “excessive fondness for fairy tales, or at any rate happy endings.”

When the pundits disagree, what can we do?

There is a real answer to the question of whether Kuznets or Piketty offers better insights into how capitalist economies behave. Science is all about choosing between competing theories. You use each theory to make predictions, and then see which set of predictions better agrees with what really happens. When you are done you go with the theory that works, regardless of what you wanted to be true. So long as everyone involved is honest, competent, and refrains from cherry-picking data to support their preconceived prejudices, that process works remarkably well.

Yet as you listen to the debate, one thing becomes instantly clear. Once you know where someone stands politically, you know what they are going to say about Piketty. And so the talking heads line up on opposite sides, and for the most part people – disturbingly including people responsible for making real policy – hear what they want to hear.

So, what to do? There are really only two choices. We can turn off our brains and line up with one set of partisans or the other. Or we can use our brains, look at the predictions of each theory, and do a smell-test to see which one stinks.

When the economic rubber hits the road, Piketty wins

By every measure, from the role of technology in production, to the balance between industrial and farm labor, to the level of per capita wealth, our economy should be over the hump in the Kuznets Curve. According to Kuznets’s thinking, rapid economic growth in today’s economy should result in a decrease in inequality as the rising tide lifts all boats.

Piketty’s wealth-begats-wealth theory makes exactly the opposite prediction. Piketty’s model says that rapid growth should primarily benefit the wealthy, and be accompanied by worsening inequality.

So let’s test those predictions. Over the last 6 years we have seen tremendous growth as the economy has come out of the Great Recession. Stock prices and return on investment are hitting record highs. If Kuznets is right, that growth should mostly be benefitting the middle class. If Piketty is right, that growth should mostly be benefiting the wealthy.

Deciding which of those two predictions works is not difficult to do. In the US, wealth is already as concentrated as it was in 1917. The top 1% holds 35% of the nation’s total wealth. That inequality is only growing. Coming out of the great recession, between 2009 and 2012 95% of economic gains went to the top 1%. It is really difficult to escape the conclusion that Piketty’s model of a money-begats-money economy is spot on target.

Speaking personally, I am a big fan of free market capitalism. Strictly controlled economies do not work well. The power of private enterprise is hard to question. But if Piketty is right – as the data clearly suggest is the case – totally unregulated free market capitalism eventually eats its young.

The question then becomes, “what to do about it?” How can we save capitalism from itself?

 


Saving Capitalism from Itself: An eight part series exploring ideas from Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century

  1. Thomas Piketty & Capitalism in the 21st Century
  2. There is No Such Thing as a Perfect System
  3. Piketty in a Nutshell
  4. Three Cheers for Small Business
  5. Inequality in a Growing Economy
  6. Economic Fairy Tales
  7. What is Wealth?
  8. Win-Win or Lose-Lose, Our Choice

Saving Capitalism from Itself ^ VI. Economic Fairy Tales  © Dr. Jeff Hester
Content may not be copied to other sites. All Rights Reserved.

Reality Straight Up!

  • Cassandra Smiling  Science, politics and a march in the rainPosted in For Your Consideration
  • EPA Rehash  A suddenly partisan NASA faces its futurePosted in Thoughts
  • The Hermeneutics of  Bunk  Alan Sokal and postmodernism’s black eyePosted in For Your Consideration
  • A Dunning-Kruger Universe  Everyone, it seems, has a “theory”Posted in For Your Consideration
  • Our Need to Know  We crave certainty, even when it is only an illusionPosted in CoachingThoughts
  • A Saguaro’s universe  Building a cactus starts with the Big BangPosted in For Your Consideration
  • Oklahoma Skies  To all the amateurs out there, thanks!Posted in For Your Consideration
  • Fight-or-Flight  How our Pleistocene brains (mis)handle modern threatsPosted in Coaching
  • In a Shark’s Eye  Science and the experience of wonderPosted in For Your Consideration
  • The Quandry of Unpredictability  Chaos, climate and an unpredictable futurePosted in For Your Consideration
  • Why I March for SciencePosted in Thoughts
  • Waiting for Skynet  The benefits of being a machinePosted in For Your Consideration
  • Cassandra Smiling
    Science, politics and a march in the rain

    On a cold day in April, 2017 scientists gathered in Washington DC and cities around the world for the March for Science. Their message was a single powerful idea. Truth is not a political expediency. Reality cannot be ignored. In the year that has followed the vital importance of that message has only grown.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • EPA Rehash
    A suddenly partisan NASA faces its future

    When I look at NASA’s new Administrator, Jim Bridenstine, it is his fellow Oklahoman Scott Pruitt’s EPA that jumps to mind. As politically uncomfortable science is pushed aside, NASA’s history of nonpartisanship appears headed for an abrupt end. Will a strongly partisan NASA have a target on its back?

    Read Article

  • The Hermeneutics of Bunk
    Alan Sokal and postmodernism’s black eye

    Some years ago, NYU physicist Alan Sokal wondered whether anti-science postmodernists could recognize politically-correct-sounding nonsense even if he rubbed their noses in it. The unwitting subjects of the Sokal Hoax jumped at the bait.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • A Dunning-Kruger Universe
    Everyone, it seems, has a “theory”

    Some people are sure they know more than the experts, but it can take a lot of knowledge to realize just how wrong an idea is.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • Our Need to Know
    We crave certainty, even when it is only an illusion

    The human brain craves the sensation of knowing like a drug addict craves the next fix. If real knowledge is uncomfortable or not at hand, we are quite content to just make something up, then convince ourselves it’s real. In a world where knowledge matters, that’s dangerous.

    Read Article

  • A Saguaro’s universe
    Building a cactus starts with the Big Bang

    The iconic saguaro cactus gives the desert an otherwordly beauty. That beauty does not exist in isolation. It embodies the fascinating and awe-inspiring processes that have shaped the universe, going all the way back to the Big Bang itself.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • Oklahoma Skies
    To all the amateurs out there, thanks!

    Looking at room full of amateur astronomers, gathered for the Okie-Tex Star Party under the spectacularly dark skies of the Oklahoma Panhandle, I am reminded of my own roots and those who helped me discover the universe.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • Fight-or-Flight
    How our Pleistocene brains (mis)handle modern threats

    A strong fight-or-flight reaction served our evolutionary ancestors well. If the leopard catches you, that’s it! But today a visceral response to a not-so-mortal threat seldom improves things. If you want to get a handle on those intense, counterproductive bouts of emotion, start by understanding where fight-or-flight came from in the first place.

    Read Article

  • In a Shark’s Eye
    Science and the experience of wonder

    Alone, 100 feet underwater, with a shark in its element, I am overwhelmed by a mixture of awe, beauty, joy, and intellectual wonder at the world that brings us together. In that moment, I experience just what science is all about.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • The Quandry of Unpredictability
    Chaos, climate and an unpredictable future

    Chaos is a sticky wicket for science. There are things a correct theory like climate change cannot predict, but there are a lot of things that it can. It’s important to understand which is which.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

  • Why I March for Science

    On Earth Day, April 22, 2017, people around the nation will March for Science. It seems strange to need to march in support of the idea that pronouncements from politicians cannot change the nature of reality, or that evidence matters when making decisions. But such are the peculiar times in which we live.

    Read Article

  • Waiting for Skynet
    The benefits of being a machine

    For biological organisms, interstellar travel is hopelessly difficult, and probably pointless. For sentient machines, however, home is the environment you were built for.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

    Read Article

Click on thumbnail to select post:

Recent Article Mobile

  • Cassandra Smiling  Science, politics and a march in the rainPosted in For Your Consideration
  • EPA Rehash  A suddenly partisan NASA faces its futurePosted in Thoughts
  • The Hermeneutics of  Bunk  Alan Sokal and postmodernism’s black eyePosted in For Your Consideration
  • A Dunning-Kruger Universe  Everyone, it seems, has a “theory”Posted in For Your Consideration
  • Our Need to Know  We crave certainty, even when it is only an illusionPosted in CoachingThoughts
  • A Saguaro’s universe  Building a cactus starts with the Big BangPosted in For Your Consideration
  • Oklahoma Skies  To all the amateurs out there, thanks!Posted in For Your Consideration
  • Fight-or-Flight  How our Pleistocene brains (mis)handle modern threatsPosted in Coaching
  • In a Shark’s Eye  Science and the experience of wonderPosted in For Your Consideration
  • The Quandry of Unpredictability  Chaos, climate and an unpredictable futurePosted in For Your Consideration
  • Why I March for SciencePosted in Thoughts
  • Waiting for Skynet  The benefits of being a machinePosted in For Your Consideration
  • On a cold day in April, 2017 scientists gathered in Washington DC and cities around the world for the March for Science. Their message was a single powerful idea. Truth is not a political expediency. Reality cannot be ignored. In the year that has followed the vital importance of that message has only grown.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • When I look at NASA’s new Administrator, Jim Bridenstine, it is his fellow Oklahoman Scott Pruitt’s EPA that jumps to mind. As politically uncomfortable science is pushed aside, NASA’s history of nonpartisanship appears headed for an abrupt end. Will a strongly partisan NASA have a target on its back?

  • Some years ago, NYU physicist Alan Sokal wondered whether anti-science postmodernists could recognize politically-correct-sounding nonsense even if he rubbed their noses in it. The unwitting subjects of the Sokal Hoax jumped at the bait.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • Some people are sure they know more than the experts, but it can take a lot of knowledge to realize just how wrong an idea is.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • The human brain craves the sensation of knowing like a drug addict craves the next fix. If real knowledge is uncomfortable or not at hand, we are quite content to just make something up, then convince ourselves it’s real. In a world where knowledge matters, that’s dangerous.

  • The iconic saguaro cactus gives the desert an otherwordly beauty. That beauty does not exist in isolation. It embodies the fascinating and awe-inspiring processes that have shaped the universe, going all the way back to the Big Bang itself.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • Looking at room full of amateur astronomers, gathered for the Okie-Tex Star Party under the spectacularly dark skies of the Oklahoma Panhandle, I am reminded of my own roots and those who helped me discover the universe.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • A strong fight-or-flight reaction served our evolutionary ancestors well. If the leopard catches you, that’s it! But today a visceral response to a not-so-mortal threat seldom improves things. If you want to get a handle on those intense, counterproductive bouts of emotion, start by understanding where fight-or-flight came from in the first place.

  • Alone, 100 feet underwater, with a shark in its element, I am overwhelmed by a mixture of awe, beauty, joy, and intellectual wonder at the world that brings us together. In that moment, I experience just what science is all about.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • Chaos is a sticky wicket for science. There are things a correct theory like climate change cannot predict, but there are a lot of things that it can. It’s important to understand which is which.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

  • On Earth Day, April 22, 2017, people around the nation will March for Science. It seems strange to need to march in support of the idea that pronouncements from politicians cannot change the nature of reality, or that evidence matters when making decisions. But such are the peculiar times in which we live.

  • For biological organisms, interstellar travel is hopelessly difficult, and probably pointless. For sentient machines, however, home is the environment you were built for.

    This article originally appeared in my Astronomy Magazine column, For Your Consideration.

Over his 30 year career as an internationally known astrophysicist, Dr. Jeff Hester was a key member of the team that repaired the Hubble Space Telescope. With one foot always on the frontiers of knowledge, he has been mentor, coach, team leader, award-winning teacher, administrator and speaker, to name a few of the hats he has worn. His Hubble image, the Pillars of Creation, was chosen by Time Magazine as among the 100 most influential photographs in history.
©Dr. Jeff Hester LLC, 5301 S. Superstition Mountain Dr., Suite 104 #171, Gold Canyon, AZ 85118